“What are the
roots that clutch, what branches grow
Out of this stony
rubbish? Son of man,
You cannot say, or
guess, for you know only
A heap of broken
images”
-TS Eliot, The
Waste Land
While reading Midnight’s Children, I have been unable to ignore how fragmentation
pervades the text; not only through the lives of the characters but in the
structure of the narrative as well. I offer an excerpt of Eliot to begin with
because, although fragmentation is not a novel concept in the 20th
century, it is certainly where this displaced sentiment (and form) has found
its stride. I intend to explore this theme on an interpersonal, individual and
national level as conveyed through the lives of Aadem/Naseem, Amina/Ahmed, and
Saleem Sinai, as both an individual and a representation of India.
The first relationship to develop
in the narrative exists between Aadem and
Naseem. As her physician, he is charged with the examination
of the landowner’s
daughter through a perforated sheet, as she is a “decent
girl….she does not flaunt her body under the noses of strange men.” (19) Over
the proceeding years, Aadem falls under the spell of the perforated sheet,
falling in love with Naseem one body part at a time, as “a badly-fitting
collage of her severally-inspected parts.” (22) Nevertheless, this collage is
regarded by Aadem as something “sacred and magical” (23) and it is through
these partial, magical glimpses that Aadem chooses to marry Naseem. The ensuing
marriage and family is beset with consternation as Aadem discovers the woman he
has constructed in his mind via the perforated sheet is not, in reality, the
same woman he has pledged his life to. Here is the first example in which
fragmentation leads to a loss of identity; as Aadem has built a picture of
Naseem piece by piece, he is unable to accept her whole identity and
particularly as she changes with time into the woman known as “Reverend Mother”
Aadem “more or less {gives} up trying to storm her many ravelins and bastions,
leaving her, like a large smug spider, to rule her chosen domain.” (40)
The second relationship which
follows very closely to Aadem and Naseem is their daughter, Amina. In love with
a basement dweller who is unable to consummate their marriage, Amina is obliged
to marry Ahmed Sinai in order to produce children. She does not love Ahmed,
however, possibly taking a cue from her father whom she is most like and
connected with in the family, she forces herself to learn to love him, “to do this
she divided him, mentally, into every single one of his component parts,
physical as well as behavioral, compartmentalizing him into lips and verbal
tics and prejudices and likes…in short, she fell under the spell of the
perforated sheet.” (73) Here again is an example of a character being unable to
accept the identity of their partner as a whole and, in this case, a
premeditated attempt to break them into palatable pieces, pieces that she will
form into her own collage resembling the man she loves, Nadir.
Both of the aforementioned
relationships convey the sense of something missing, something, which I would
argue, is identity. For Aadem, this began with the rejection of his faith, as
he was “knocked forever in that middle place, unable to worship a God whose existence he could not
wholly disbelieve” a result of which “a permanent alteration: a hole” formed
within him. Aadem’s inability to reconcile his former spiritual life with the
new life he discovered while studying in Germany has left him at an impasse and
left him vulnerable to the allure of the perforated sheet. For Naseem, it is
only after she has married Aadem that we begin to see her as “adrift in the
universe” (41) and is unable to specify the environment around her, relying on
the phrase “whatsitsname” as an ever debilitating crutch. As for Amina and
Ahmed, they each develop their own coping mechanisms at the racetrack and the
bottle, respectively.
Although
not biologically related, Saleem relays the history of Aadem, Naseem, Amina and
Ahmed as if they are inextricably linked to his own existence. And they
are. He comes to discover that “"the
ghostly essence of the perforated sheet, which doomed my mother to learn to
love a man in segments, and which condemned me to see my own life -- its meaning,
its structures -- in fragments also; so that by the time I understood it, it
was far too late" (119) As he physically fragments and disintegrates, so
too does his narrative; the oscillations from his present state of affairs and
the story which he is attempting to convey become more frequent and cumbersome,
erstwhile he beseeches the reader, “please believe me that I am falling apart.”
(36)
He claims that he is falling into
630 million pieces, which, at the time of publication, was the estimated population
of India. Saleem could then be viewed as the representation of India as a
nation (his birth coinciding with the birth of the nation is another clear
connection) It is with this piece
that we can then take the theme of fragmentation to a national level; from
partition to independence to discussion of dividing India along religious or
linguistic lines, Rushdie utilizes his characters to demonstrate how, by
breaking down into individual pieces, one loses the essence of the whole and
thus India would cease to exist if it were to fragment along these lines.
So I thought your post was insightful . Now to comment. Strengths - I think the Eliot quote was provocative: the correspondence beyond the fragmentation was the threw itself, roots and all, a symbol only, history, origin: from what soil does fragmentation grow? stony rubbish? What is barren (prior to possibility) or waste (exhausted possibility)? Where were these twisted elements that root our story? Old Kashmir its ancient ways and superstitions, it shelteredness from the wider world? Is it his grandfathers disbelief, and so western medicine, and so western knowledge, and so enlightenment and so man's natural desire to know? Or is it more literal, is it the very earth out of which we grow, already half asleep, still half dead, closed and indifferent? Many roots lead to Revelations.
ReplyDeleteI also liked your fact about Indias population - that was a rather specific number. It goes to show, as you might've said, the Holist strain I Rushdie's metaphysics.
However , to take issue with that - I think you read the holism in the book too straightforwardly as the good, when its more complicated - after all, isn't it fragmentation that keeps the suspense up, which makes You and me and Padma keep coming back? Ditto with respect to 1001 Nights and its original use of fragmented storytelling to delay an unwanted sexual encounter . In fact, isn't the fragmented sheet our most cherished heirloom, reader and character alike? Isn't that one of the most compelling parts of the story - wasn't it the easiest and the most smile-inducing to image - young aadem and naseem and that ridiculous sheet and day after day and a little more and...finally! Of course there is no whole without fragments. And though we pay lip service to the whole, we serenade the fragment.
Also, one thing i strongly take object with is the parallel between Aminas gambling and Ahmeds drinking. Which you call coping mechanisms. And usually they are - as addictive habits. But while clearly Ahmed drinks to escape and indulge in his own "private dreams" , amina gambles only as a way of confronting realty head on - not for hiding or escape at all. This is shown by her declaration that if no one else is going to be a man she will solve the financial issues. And shown further by the fact that once its served its purpose, she stops gambling and never gives it a second thought - so zero evidence that she was getting any kind of personal fix out of the thrill. Just a woman doing her business - albeit the venture was risky.
Threw should read tree. "only" should read of family. I typed that on my phone. The one with the fragmented screen. And I was eating Chipotle. I had the fragmented burrito. (The tacos!)
ReplyDelete